Live · 40+ lenders
Guide · By LendScope Editorial · 14 May 2026 (updated 15 May 2026) · 12 min read

How serviceability works in Australia (2026 edition)

Every Australian lender runs a slightly different serviceability calculation, but they all share the same skeleton — APRA buffer, HEM benchmark, income shading, DTI cap. This guide walks through every input that moves the max-borrow number, what the major-four typically do in 2026, and where lenders diverge in practice.

1. What is serviceability?

Serviceability is the lender's test of whether a borrower can comfortably afford the proposed loan repayments plus their existing commitments plus ordinary living expenses, with a buffer for future rate rises. It is the single biggest gate between an application and a "yes".

Two regulators shape it in Australia: APRA (prudential standards for ADIs — the buffer rule) and ASIC (responsible-lending obligations under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act). Brokers and lenders share liability for getting the assessment right.

2. The assessment rate

Lenders never assess a loan at the headline rate the customer would actually pay. Instead they stress it. The assessment rate is:

assess_rate = max(actual_rate + APRA_buffer, min_assess_rate)

In 2026, the typical numbers are:

So a 6.14% rate becomes a 9.14% assessment rate at most majors. Repayments are then computed at that stressed rate over the loan term.

Refinance exception: Where APRA approved it, ADIs can apply a 1% buffer instead of 3% for "like-for-like" refinances of an existing loan from another lender. Coverage varies — not every major has it on every product. Check policy notes per lender.

3. The APRA 3% buffer — a brief history

The serviceability buffer is set by APRA under prudential standard APS 220:

FromBufferTrigger
Dec 20142.0%First explicit guidance after housing-stability concerns
Jul 20192.5%Replaced the old 7.25% floor
Nov 20213.0%Cyclical risk increase ahead of cash-rate rises

The buffer is technically a "floor below which lenders should not go". Lenders may apply higher buffers as policy — some non-banks routinely add 3.5%.

4. Income shading by income type

Lenders don't take gross income at face value. Each income type is shaded — multiplied by a haircut to account for variability and continuity risk.

Income typeTypical shading at majorsNotes
PAYG base salary100%Used in full where stable
Self-employed (2-yr avg)80%Net profit + addbacks; some use lower of last 2 yrs
Casual income80%Often requires 6–12 months continuous
Overtime50% (essential), 80% (non-essential)Police/nurses/paramedics get 80–100%
Rental income75–80%Macquarie, ING and ubank tend to 80%; CBA/NAB 75%
Bonus / commission80%Usually 2-year average
Centrelink / FTB100% when ongoingAge-of-child cut-offs apply for FTB

This is where lenders most visibly disagree — see the lender directory for the per-lender shading table.

5. The HEM benchmark

The Household Expenditure Measure (HEM) is published quarterly by the Melbourne Institute. It estimates the minimum sensible spend on essentials + a "modest discretionary" allowance, segmented by household composition, location and income band.

Lenders use HEM as a floor for declared living expenses — if the borrower's declared expenses are below HEM, the lender substitutes HEM. The actual figure isn't published in dollars (it varies by every applicant profile) but the multiplier each lender applies is well-known to brokers:

stress_living_expenses = max(declared_expenses, HEM × lender_multiplier)

Most majors apply a 1.05× HEM multiplier; non-banks often sit at 0.95–1.00×; ubank, Suncorp and BOQ at 1.00×. The variation matters: on a typical scenario, a 0.05× swing on HEM moves borrowing capacity by AUD 10–25k.

6. Existing liabilities

Three liability classes hit serviceability the hardest:

  1. Existing loans — assessed at the existing repayment, often grossed up by the APRA buffer if a variable rate, or at the loan's actual fixed rate if fixed for >2 years remaining.
  2. Credit cards — assessed not on the balance but on the limit, at a 3.8% monthly repayment assumption at most majors (3.0% at some non-banks). A AUD 30,000 card limit therefore costs ~AUD 1,140/mo regardless of balance.
  3. HECS / HELP — the actual ATO repayment based on income bands, deducted from gross. Doesn't compound but does scale linearly with income.

7. The DTI cap

Even if a borrower passes serviceability, lenders apply a debt-to-income (DTI) cap as a secondary gate. Calculated as:

DTI = (total_debt_including_proposed_loan) / (gross_annual_income)

APRA has been encouraging ADIs to limit DTI > 6× exposure to less than 30% of new lending. In practice, most majors will quietly soft-decline at DTI > 7× and aggressively decline beyond 8×. Non-banks tolerate higher DTI on a case-by-case basis.

8. A worked example

PAYG couple, no kids, looking at a AUD 850,000 loan with CBA at 6.14% variable, 30-year term:

That same applicant at NAB or Westpac would land within ~AUD 80–150/mo of CBA's surplus. At Macquarie (80% rental shading vs 75%, slightly tighter HEM treatment) borrowing capacity might be ~AUD 30k higher. LendScope runs all 40+ side-by-side so you don't have to.

9. Why lenders disagree

Two lenders given identical inputs will routinely produce max-borrow numbers AUD 60,000–120,000 apart. The drivers, in order of magnitude:

  1. Rate differential — 30 bp lower headline rate ≈ AUD 25k more borrowing on a typical scenario.
  2. HEM multiplier — 0.95× vs 1.05× ≈ AUD 20k swing.
  3. Income shading on variable income — biggest swing for self-employed and casual workers.
  4. CC liability assumption — 3.0% vs 3.8% monthly on a AUD 30k card limit ≈ AUD 30k swing.
  5. Rental shading — matters for property investors; 75% vs 80% on AUD 50k rental ≈ AUD 15k swing.
  6. Floor rate — most stuck at 5.25%, but a few non-banks set their floor lower.

10. Tools and references

Run a scenario in LendScope →